THE RETURN OF DRACULA (?)
Every woman wants to find love and be loved in that very special way. Why not Diana, Princess of Wales, Duchess of Cornwall, Duchess of Rothesay, Countess of Chester, and Baroness of Renfrew?
The wedding of Charles, Prince of Wales, and Lady Diana Spencer took place on 29 July 1981 at St Paul's Cathedral, London, United Kingdom. Diana was the star of the fairytale wedding. Two million spectators lined the route of Diana's procession from Clarence House, with 4,000 police and 2,201 military officers to manage the crowds while an estimated 750 million watched around the globe via TV. Feted by the media, she was attributed the status of a goddess. Her life took on mythical dimensions when ending in tragedy, the consequence of a broken heart seeking to find love again.
Diana died travelling with her lover, Dodi Fayed, son of Mohamed Fayed nicknamed the “Phony Pharaoh” because of pretensions to royalty. Mohamed Fayed owned the upmarket Harrods, the largest department store in Europe. Nevertheless, the thought of the mother of two future heirs to the British Throne marrying a common Muslim is said to have been too much for the royals of Britain to bear.
There is much speculation surrounding Lady Diana Spencer’s death. Did the not so bonny Prince Charlie (as he was once called) arrange for her death? The question itself is mere speculation. Surely, such a person as he would not be so callous; after all the Prince of Wales is passionate about animals and their conservation. [Click here for his site.]Although, Diana is on record as having said that she believed Charles was going to murder her.
The European elite present as very honorable people—at least, on the face of it. The mere fact that they all appear to have had ties to the Nazis and they were sympathizers of the regime has been forgotten; except by those who dig up the alternative history that overturns propaganda history.
Labeled as conspiracy theorists, alternative history buffs have a habit of digging up information that seems off the charts compared to the official version of history. For instance, consider the following photos of Diana’s ex-husband the Prince of Wales and that of the man dubbed “Count Dracula”, Vlad the Impaler. There are suggestions that these two are related. The implications are that bonny Prince Charlie has an evil streak within him that is inherited from Vlad the Impaler, ruler of Transylvania. Do you think there is any likeness?
Unofficial historians are dismissed when they come up with claims that the secret occult society Dragon Sovereignty, also known as the "Rex Deus" fraternity, was created by Catholic Holy Roman Emperor Sigismund and occultist Vlad the Impaler - the historical figure behind the Dracula myths. The Dragon Court is directly linked to the European Council of Princes - the political body of the European Grail families, who participated in the formation of the New World Order think-tank "The Bilderberg Group". All this is traceable back to the days of Nimrod and Babel according to the unofficial history buffs. Unfortunately, wackos like David Ike produce theories that a race of reptilians are shape shifters disguised as nobility and some suggest that Prince Charles is really Dracula.
Evidently, Vlad’s barbaric cruelty was legendary. Vlad delighted in the sadistic torture of between 40,000-100,000 (or more) victims by seeing them impaled alive. The suggestion that the Prince of Wales is a reincarnation of the Transylvanian ruler Vlad The Impaler has to be absurd. Yet people make these claims because the Prince of Wales has purchased more land in Transylvania the territory of his ancestor. Yes! Surprise! Surprise! Prince Charles actually is a descendant of Vlad The Impaler—see, Prince Charles admission in the video below—no wonder there is such a likeness.
The royal wedding of Lady Diana Spencer to the Prince of Wales, heir to the Throne of the British Empire was seen by 250 million people more than the elite would like to have live on this Earth. The elite would prefer to see only 500 million people existing on this planet upon which we live, not 750 million. If you accept that history repeats, imagining a king and queen with a global population to adore them and serve them is not too difficult. Similar themes repeat in fiction, even though there are many pushes for republics and presidential elections. However, if you saw how everybody stood as Queen Elizabeth entered the chamber to address the United Nations General Assembly for the first time in 53 years and how they received her when she gave her address, you would have to be forgiven for thinking that she is the queen of the world. Here is the context of her short address.
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon welcomes Queen Elizabeth to the General Assembly stating:
This is the blueprint of the world's leaders, to save lives of the poor and vulnerable, to combat hunger and disease, to promote gender equality and to provide education, opportunity and decent work for billions of people. We will once again heed your call and devote our full strength to the ideals of our charter and realizing a better world for all.
Your Majesty, to your dedication to the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth, to the United Nations and our common values we say thank you and welcome.
The Queen said nothing controversial but do not overlook the subtle subliminal thrust of her message. The following are extracts of her opening statement and final sentence, with one near the end.
I believe I was last here in 1957. Since then, I have travelled widely and met many leaders, ambassadors and statesmen from around the world. I address you today as Queen of sixteen United Nations Member States and as Head of the Commonwealth of 54 countries….
Last November, when I opened the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Trinidad and Tobago, I told the delegates that the Commonwealth had the opportunity to lead. Today I offer you the same message....
In tomorrow’s world, we must all work together as hard as ever if we are truly to be United Nations.
When we consider what Ban Ki-Moon stated and what Queen Elizabeth II said, the underlying message is she rules the Earth. This is the case, even though she is titular head of the Commonwealth states. Notice too, the words “United Nations Member States” instead of “members of the United Nations” or “member states of the United Nations”.
This is a carefully crafted speech given in July 2010. The speech contributes nothing at all to anything other than to remind the General Assembly who is really running the show and expectations that the war on terrorism must continue and climate change is part of the agenda.
What many people do not realize is that “The British Israelite Theory” pinpoints the United Kingdom throne as being the legitimate throne of King David of Israel. This has much to do with the way the world is heading. And while Ki-Moon talks about helping billions of people, what really is in the minds of the globalists is helping billions of people to disappear. Those who belong to the nobility and those who belong to the establishment of Europe and the United States have an agenda; one that does not include the rest of us.
The time of the end is getting closer and these people are stitch-by-stitch knitting together their plan for a global takeover. Sometimes they will try to stitch us the people up too quickly and then they will undo some of the stitches, but not all of them. Only sufficient for people to think their objection to big government is under consideration and then another campaign will begin.
Individual liberties and rights are being lost every step of the way.
The only reason the sons of Satan cannot do what they would like to do, even though they have had many attempts, is the Lord God is not out of the way.
- For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains it will do so until he is out of the way. (2 Thessalonians 2:6)
Once the predetermined number of people destined for eternal salvation has been reached, suddenly, without warning, calamity will strike. Before His crucifixion, Lord Jesus said concerning the end time:
- For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never will be. (Matthew 24:21)
Just because a swan glides on the water and captures your attention by the way it moves its head and neck, this does not mean it is not doing things you cannot see, like paddling flat out under water to keep up its charade of graciousness. Likewise, when noting the Royals and the Billionaires and their tokens of charity, think not what they can do for you, rather think what they are intending to do to you.
Fortunately, Lord Jesus Christ is able to save us from the fate that is coming to the world. Just make sure, the Devil has not got your ear.
.
Comments
Post a Comment