The Threat To Democracy Has Been Averted By The Election Within A Republic

American University historian Allan Lichtman was dubbed "Nostradamus" for correctly predicting Trump's victory eight years ago in 2016. This time he predicted Harris would win. Apparently, he became "increasingly despondent" and began having doomsday thoughts when watching Harris getting trounced in Pennsylvania and Michigan turning for Trump.

Nous                                             

What is clear to anyone with a little nous, who has done some investigation into the US Presidential elections of 2020 and 2024, Harris and Biden received ballots instead of votes, because they were recipients of numerous fake ballots that were classified as genuine votes. 

 

Discrepancy

Apart from the fact Harris was selected rather than elected, had a mother born in India and a father from African and Irish ancestry, she was billed as a black American.  

Harris had no children, but neither is she a transvestite. She has no need to gaslight the public by hiring a couple of children (who looked like their god-parents as Obama's girls do) without evidence of ever being pregnant and failing to produce birth certificates.

The mainstream media billed Kamala Harris as extraordinarily popular, more so than Biden. Initially, the fake polls had her trouncing Trump. By Election Day she was running neck and neck with Trump, to make sure the race would be tight—the battle a fair fight. As with Biden, once more, Harris' controllers expected to win in the battleground states.

What stands out, however, is the glaring discrepancy in the number of ballots awarded to Harris when compared to Biden in 2020.  

How could a black American woman, with the supposed popularity of Oprah Winfrey at her zenith, receive 13 million less votes at the ballot box than the senile geriatric whitey? 

In 2020, Biden, who conducted his campaign from his basement and the occasional shopping precinct car park, received 81,283,501 ballots in his favor. 

 

Harris didn't conduct her campaign from her basement. Instead, she made use of rent-a-crowd; even bussing her hired supporters from state to state to fill gymnasiums and small halls. She received around 68 million ballots.

 

The main reason Harris received 13 million less ballots than Biden was the Democrats were not able to duplicate the greatest election fraud that her predecessor, during his campaign, boasted would be pulled off. 

 

Trucks

According to Alex Jones, when trucks of ballots were brought to Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvanian counting rooms, they were turned away by police accompanied by Republican officials.

 

Trump called out the Pennsylvania cheating during the evening, no doubt creating some fear among the Democrats that they might get caught, if they decided to commit fraud. This nevertheless caused rebuttals to be made public by officials.  Notably, there were no massive early morning spikes in ballots for Harris, as there was for Biden in 2020. 

 

Reuters claimed that there was nothing untoward about (what were clearly coordinated) voting spikes occurring during the early morning hours of November 6, 2020. They were just legitimate election anomalies and merely "pro-Biden county vote dumps and a clerical error"—nothing to see here!

 

Odd

Trump, however, received over 74 million votes back in 2020. He has received around 1 million less votes in 2024. This seems odd, considering that turnout for Republicans was supposedly higher in these elections, for they needed it to be "too big to rig".

 

Surely, the number of votes for Trump would have had to have been more than 81 million if this was going to be "too big to rig"; not less. 

 

Something doesn't seem quite right when we consider the outcome and the effort put in to remove illegitimate voting.

 

The total votes for Trump were 74,223,975 in 2020. This election they are some 1 million votes less than last time 73,236,927.

 

We were told that the numbers this time were going to make this election too big to rig in favor of Harris, even if the demons were able to rig it as in 2020. Many were expecting Trump to receive over 100 million votes.

 

The results were not comparable to Reagan or Nixon or the Democrat Roosevelt.

 

Some pundits suggested there would be 120 million votes for Trump; especially after the many campaign rallies held by the Don that were overflowing with tens of thousands and the control that he had over the RNC.

 

Strategic

After Trump’s daughter-in-law, Lara, became the co-chair of the Republican National Committee in March, 2024, strategies for winning the election changed and became more determined than what was happening under Ronna McDaniel, niece of the Trump-hating duplicitous Mitt Romney.

 

The strategic effort of numerous individuals for the Republican cause in ballot harvesting, filing lawsuits to purge the voting rolls of dead people, ex-residents, and non-citizens, played an important part in weeding out millions of votes that would have been used by the Democrats. 

 

The exposure before Election Day of the many flaws in the voting machines and how they are used to reject ballots, flip ballots and fill in ballots further caused concern for the Democrats. Unlike 2020, this exposure would provide more reason to contest results. 

 

Along with the exposure of the fraudulent practices leading into Election Day, ensuring that Republicans were voting early and their numbers were ahead of the Democrats in all the key battleground states at the morning of November 5, caught the opposition flat-footed. 

 

The Demon-rats load up the early voting with fake ballots so that they are fifty thousand or so in front on the morning of the election. Since more people are conservative and vote Republican rather than Democrat, by loading up the early ballots, the 'rats can beat Republican candidates in seemingly close races without having to work so hard at the back end, where it becomes more obvious foul play is afoot. 

 

Moreover, in traditional Democrat electorates, the early voting with fake ballots assists in dissuading Republicans from voting. After all, who wants to stand in long lines to support a losing candidate?

 

Fraud is carried out only by a comparatively small number of unscrupulous operatives, and usually because they are paid. Why else would people decide to commit election fraud if they were not the beneficiaries? 

 

Threat

According to once-upon-a-time-presidential-candidate-hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy, the exit polls showed that "threats to democracy" were a major concern of voters in the US Presidential Elections.  Since the Democrats were pumping the idea that Trump was a threat to democracy they were pumped up by the thought their propaganda was having its desired effect. 

 

What the clowns didn't count on was the "threat to democracy" those polled were referencing, was not to the Harris campaign's portrayal of Donald J. Trump as a Nazi tyrant and Hitler reincarnated, but matters such as:

• an IRS armed force to investigate personal income tax (which is unconstitutional) anomalies,
• unjustified lawfare against Trump,
• jailing of peaceful protestors attending January 6. 2021, Washington D.C. rally, 
• censorship of citizens on social media,
• threat to take away private ownership of guns,
• $billions sent to Ukraine to fight Russia,
• support for the genocide of Palestinians, just to name some.

 Still, better Trump than Harris.

 

What the wicked dreads will come upon him, but the desire of the righteous will be granted. (Proverbs 10:24)

 

Caring is sharing.