Infanticide Has Been Proposed And Actually May Happen But It Isn't As Acceptable As Abortion

 

There are jurisdictions that permit full-term elective abortion—that is, abortion up to birth without restriction as to reason. However, the legal and practical realities are more nuanced.

Here’s a breakdown:

⚖️ Jurisdictions Where Full-Term Elective Abortion is Legal or Possible

1. Canada

  • Legal Status: No federal law restricts abortion at any stage of pregnancy.

  • Details: The Supreme Court of Canada struck down all abortion laws in R. v. Morgentaler (1988), and no new law has replaced it.

  • Reality: While late-term abortions are legally permissible, they are rare and typically performed only for serious medical reasons due to medical practice guidelines and provider discretion.

2. Colombia

  • Legal Status: As of 2022, abortion is legal up to 24 weeks for any reason. After 24 weeks, it is allowed for exceptions (e.g., life or health of the woman, fetal anomaly).

  • Close to Full-Term: While not strictly full-term elective, 24 weeks with no restrictions is among the most permissive.

3. United States (Selective Jurisdictions)

  • After the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health (2022) decision overturned Roe v. Wade, abortion laws are now decided at the state level.

  • States that allow abortion without gestational limits in law (as of 2024):

    • Colorado

    • New Mexico

    • Oregon

    • Vermont

    • Washington, D.C.

  • Reality: While technically permitted, elective abortions in the third trimester are extremely rare, and most providers will only perform them in exceptional cases (severe fetal anomalies or maternal health risks).

🔎 Important Notes:

  • Even in places where the law allows it, medical ethics, provider policies, and hospital regulations often prevent purely elective late-term abortions.

  • In most countries with liberal abortion laws, third-trimester abortions typically require medical justification.

  • The availability of providers willing to perform full-term abortions is also a limiting factor.


There have been claims by medical professionals and insiders suggesting that full-term or near-term abortions have occurred outside the scope of the law, or in ways that stretch or exploit legal loopholes. This issue sits at the intersection of ethics, medicine, and politics, and it is deeply controversial.

🩺 What Some Doctors Have Claimed

Several whistleblowers, former abortion providers, and investigative reports have alleged that:

  1. Full-term abortions were sometimes performed under broad interpretations of mental health exemptions—even where the law was more restrictive.

  2. Paperwork was altered or rationalized to make late-term procedures appear medically necessary.

  3. In a small number of cases, infants were delivered alive and then left to die or were actively terminated—particularly in countries or U.S. states where fetal viability laws apply. These are the most extreme and controversial allegations.

  4. Selective enforcement or a “don’t ask, don’t tell” environment meant that some facilities operated with de facto immunity, especially in jurisdictions where prosecutors were ideologically aligned with abortion providers.

📚 Examples Cited in Public Discourse

  • Dr. Kermit Gosnell (Philadelphia, USA): Perhaps the most infamous case—convicted of murder in 2013 for killing babies born alive during illegal late-term abortions. His clinic operated outside legal and medical norms for years.

  • Dr. Susan Robinson (USA): One of the few who openly admitted performing abortions in the third trimester, saying she does so in specific tragic cases but also pointed out how some abortions happen very close to term.

  • Live Action undercover investigations: These activist-led exposés have included recordings of clinic workers describing how late-term abortions can be arranged in ways that raise ethical and legal concerns—though critics argue these are selectively edited.

🏛️ Why This Happens Despite Laws

  • "Health" Exemptions: Many laws permit abortion after the viability threshold (around 24 weeks) if the mother’s life or health is at risk. The term “health” has often been interpreted broadly to include emotional or psychological well-being, effectively creating an open door to elective late-term procedures.

  • Lack of Oversight: Some clinics operate with minimal external scrutiny, especially if state or provincial regulators are understaffed or ideologically disengaged.

  • Fear of Prosecution: Some medical boards or politicians are reluctant to act on such claims due to the highly politicized nature of abortion.

⚠️ Controversy and Consequences

  • Pro-choice advocates often argue that these cases are rare and sensationalized, warning that their portrayal fuels misinformation and stigma.

  • Pro-life advocates assert that such cases are proof of systemic abuse and a need for stricter laws and oversight.

  • Most medical professionals consider full-term elective abortion unethical unless performed for grave fetal or maternal reasons.


​There is documented evidence supporting claims that some medical professionals have performed full-term or near-term abortions that were unlawful or ethically questionable. These instances often involve violations of existing laws, exploitation of legal loopholes, or practices that stretch the boundaries of medical ethics.​

🩺 Notable Cases and Investigations

1. Dr. Kermit Gosnell (Philadelphia, USA)

Dr. Kermit Gosnell operated a clinic in Philadelphia where he performed illegal late-term abortions. In 2013, he was convicted of:

The clinic was described as a "House of Horrors," with unsanitary conditions and untrained staff. Gosnell's practices were in clear violation of Pennsylvania law, which prohibits abortions after 24 weeks of gestation except in cases where the mother's life is at risk. ​

2. Dr. Susan Robinson (New Mexico, USA)

Dr. Susan Robinson is one of the few physicians in the United States who openly perform third-trimester abortions. Operating in New Mexico, where there are no specific legal restrictions on late-term abortions, she has stated:

“So there is nothing legal to stop me from doing any abortion that I think is appropriate.” ​The World from PRX+4Glamour+4Later Abortion Initiative+4ClinicQuotes+1nrlc.org+1nrlc.org+1ClinicQuotes+1

While her practices are legal within New Mexico, they highlight how the absence of gestational limits can lead to abortions being performed at very late stages of pregnancy.​

3. Live Action Undercover Investigations

Live Action, a pro-life organization, has conducted undercover investigations into abortion clinics across the United States. In their "Inhuman" series, they documented instances where clinic staff appeared willing to perform late-term abortions under questionable circumstances. For example, in one investigation, a staff member at a Washington, D.C. clinic suggested that if a baby were born alive during a late-term abortion, they would not provide care to the infant. ​The Washington Times+2Wikipedia+2Christian Post+2Live Action+4Live Action+4Christian Post+4

These investigations have sparked debates about the ethical and legal boundaries of late-term abortions, especially in jurisdictions with minimal regulatory oversight.​

⚖️ Legal and Ethical Implications

While some jurisdictions have permissive abortion laws, these cases underscore concerns about:

  • Exploitation of legal loopholes: Broad interpretations of "health" exceptions can sometimes be used to justify late-term abortions that may not align with the original intent of the law.

  • Lack of oversight: Inadequate regulation and inspection of clinics can allow unlawful practices to go undetected for extended periods.

  • Ethical considerations: Performing abortions at or near full term raises complex ethical questions, particularly when the procedures are elective and not medically necessary.​

These instances highlight the importance of clear legal frameworks, rigorous oversight, and ethical guidelines to ensure that abortion practices align with both legal standards and medical ethics.​

​There have been claims and political rhetoric suggesting that Democratic lawmakers have proposed or supported legislation permitting "post-birth abortion" or infanticide. However, these assertions are not substantiated by legislative records or official party platforms.​

🔍 Clarifying the Claims

The term "post-birth abortion" is not recognized in medical or legal contexts. Infanticide—the act of killing a newborn—is illegal in all U.S. states and under federal law. No Democratic legislation has proposed legalizing this act.​PolitiFactAustin American-Statesman+1PolitiFact+1

The confusion often arises from discussions around the "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act," a bill introduced by Republicans. This legislation aimed to mandate specific medical care for infants born alive after attempted abortions. Democrats have opposed this bill, arguing that existing laws already protect such infants and that the bill could interfere with medical professionals' judgment and women's reproductive rights. For instance, in 2019, Democrats blocked the Senate GOP bill on infants surviving abortions, stating that it was unnecessary and aimed at restricting access to legal abortion. ​Wikipedia+3National Catholic Register+3National Review+3PBS: Public Broadcasting Service+1FactCheck.org+1

🏛️ Virginia's 2019 Abortion Bill Controversy

In 2019, Virginia Delegate Kathy Tran introduced a bill to relax certain abortion restrictions, allowing third-trimester abortions if a single physician determined it necessary for the woman's health. During a radio interview, Governor Ralph Northam discussed scenarios involving non-viable fetuses and stated that in such cases, the infant would be kept comfortable, and a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother regarding the next steps. This statement was interpreted by some as endorsing infanticide, leading to significant controversy. However, Northam's office clarified that his comments referred to medical decisions in cases of severe fetal abnormalities or non-viable pregnancies, not the termination of healthy newborns. ​Wikipedia

✅ Conclusion

There is no evidence that Democratic lawmakers have proposed or supported legislation that would legalize infanticide or "post-birth abortion." Such claims are based on misinterpretations or misrepresentations of legislative proposals and public statements. Infanticide remains a criminal offense across the United States, and no political party has advocated for its legalization.​

Over the years, a few doctors and former abortion providers have come forward claiming that viable infants—even those who were born alive—were intentionally left to die or were actively terminated. These claims have been cited by both whistleblowers and political activists, often sparking outrage and leading to heated debates over whether infanticide is being quietly practiced under the cover of legal abortion.

Here are some names and testimonies that might be worth remembering:

🩸 Possible Doctor You May Be Thinking Of

Dr. Levatino (Dr. Anthony Levatino)

  • Background: Former abortionist who performed over 1,200 abortions before becoming pro-life.

  • Testimony: He has spoken publicly—especially before U.S. Congress—about the brutality of late-term abortions, but does not claim to have killed born-alive infants. He describes the gruesome reality of procedures and their moral toll.

  • Might be familiar from: Live Action videos, where he explains procedures in clinical detail.

Dr. Susan Robinson

  • Mentioned earlier—one of the few who openly performs third-trimester abortions.

  • While she has not admitted to post-birth killing, she has spoken about patients receiving abortions at 37 weeks, drawing alarm and scrutiny.

Dr. Deborah Nucatola

  • Senior director of medical services for Planned Parenthood who appeared in a Center for Medical Progress undercover video discussing fetal tissue procurement.

  • While the discussion focused on harvesting fetal organs, her manner and language caused major backlash.

  • She did not confess to killing living babies, but critics used the footage to imply unethical practices.

Gosnell Case Witnesses

  • Dr. Kermit Gosnell's clinic staff, particularly Adrienne Moton, testified during the 2013 trial that babies born alive were “snipped” at the neck—a euphemism for severing the spinal cord.

  • This case involved real, documented infanticide, and several staff members pleaded guilty or were convicted.

Jill Stanek

  • Registered nurse, not a doctor.

  • She testified that infants born alive after failed abortions were left to die in a utility room at Christ Hospital in Illinois.

  • Her claims were central to the push for the federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (2002).

🔍 Why These Testimonies Matter

Even when such practices are not legally sanctioned, testimonies like these:

  • Raise urgent ethical and legal questions.

  • Fuel debates about oversight, reporting, and whistleblower protections.

  • Prompt legislative action aimed at closing loopholes or reinforcing penalties for infanticide.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Swings And Roundabouts At The Evil Playground Predators Prey Upon For Fun To Their Eternal Detriment

Image
  The Diversity-Equity-Inclusion (DEI) psyop according to Scott Adams (creator of  the syndicated "Dilbert" comic strip  that was making him a mint until he supported Trump in 1916, and   still does ), has said, I have been told, that whoever came up with DEI = "Didn't Earn It" has single-handedly destroyed the Diversity-Equity-Inclusion psyop. The keypad proves it is mightier than the sword.   Bitcoin Bitcoin Ben (gone from truck driver to major bitcoin pundit now joined up with General Michael Flynn, former head of intelligence), in an  interview with "Hopium" Dave  (christened "Hopium" when interviewing General Flynn), says that Larry Fink has been redpilled, has dropped the environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) psyop ( check out Texas ) and has been buying bitcoin.    Ben reckons that the price of bitcoin is going stratospheric ($US200,000 a digital coin by September) now that Fink (unofficial head of the business...
Read more

The Cladding Used To Disguise Event 201's Plandemic Is Falling Off So Dictators Double Down In Austria, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

  Recalling how the current planned global crisis was war-gamed at both CLADE X and Event 201 keeps us focused and  ahead of the game.   To quote   Michael Rectenwald PhD,  an academic focusing on cultural studies:   The CLADE X and Event 201 simulations anticipated almost every eventuality of the actual COVID crisis, most notably the responses by governments, health agencies, the media, tech companies, and elements of the public. The responses and their effects included worldwide lockdowns, the collapse of businesses and industries, the adoption of biometric surveillance technologies, an emphasis on social media censorship to combat “misinformation,” the flooding of social and legacy media with “authoritative sources,” widespread riots, and mass unemployment.   The plan  is for digital immunization (INJECTION) passports and ID to restrict people's movements. To quote  Bill Gates :   Eventually, what we will have to have i...
Read more

Evidence Of Aliens From Ancient South America Proven To Explode Many Theories

Image
In South America, the elongated heads of the Paracas skulls have created a mystery that seems to demonstrate evidence of the evolution of man, because when certain people look for human evolution, they believe the shapes of the skulls are the deciding factor. Believers in evolution think these skulls just might be that missing link   they are longing to find; but then some people say they are not a missing link of anything, because they are aliens from outer space; others settle for coneheads made with boards compressing babies' heads. Foot binding is similar to head binding; which is what the Chinese once did to little girls' feet (apparently to strengthen pelvic muscles by walking); unfortunately, as they grew into women, the feet would not just be small, but deformed and tiny feet. Daniel Lee's evolutionary version of life from fish to modern man does not include anything that looks the Paracas skulls. ​In wikipedia's March To Progress ,​ whic...
Read more