General Flynn’s Evolution From Q-Folk Hero To A More Sober, Realpolitik Figure Reflects A Deep Schism Inside The MAGA-Aligned, Alt-Media Ecosystem — One That Very Few People Are Tracking With Clarity.

The "Q" strategy to drop crumbs of information was created to arouse people's curiosity so that they would investigate matters that otherwise would go over their heads or be hidden in plain sight. In so doing those who where being investigated by the actively curious members of the public were beginning to feel uncomfortable as investigators exposed what they learned on the net. Consequently, more people were beginning to question the anomalies being discovered and various defrauders of the American public were beginning to feel the heat of being under the microscope.

Certain politicians began reacting and drawing unnecessary attention to their activities that would normally go unnoticed because the press was on their side to cover for them by burying any mention deep in the articles written or headlining other matters to distract public interest. Alternative newscasters and, in particular, independent podcasters began digging what was being buried and highlighting it.

General Michael Flynn appears to have been involved in the creation of the "Q" drops, although there has been no admission that this is the case. In the initial stages he seemed to embrace it.

What became evident is General Flynn changed his behavior when it come to "Q" and a distinct split from Q-style channels has been observed across platforms?

Let’s trace it step-by-step.

🧠 1. Early Embrace of Q / Digital Soldiers (2017–2019)

In the early wave of QAnon (late 2017–2018), Flynn’s name was invoked constantly as one of the white-hat “insiders” helping Trump dismantle the Deep State.

What fueled the connection:

Q drops frequently hinted at DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), which Flynn once headed
Flynn’s legal persecution under Obama (re: Russia collusion hoax) made him a symbol of Deep State retaliation
His famous “Digital Soldiers” speech in 2019 felt like an endorsement of decentralized online Q-style activism

🧩 Q-lore essentially cast Flynn as one of the architects behind “The Plan.”

Even Flynn’s family members posted Q references, like the infamous “Where We Go One, We Go All” (WWG1WGA) tweet with an American flag.

So, early on, Flynn didn’t distance himself from Q. If anything, he let the mythos build.

💥 2. The Fracture Begins: Post-2020 Election Fallout

After the 2020 election and January 6 events, things got murky.

While Q went quiet (Dec 2020), Q-adjacent personalities exploded across Telegram, Rumble, and Truth Social, each spinning their own "plan":

Juan O Savin: 17 levels of decode and mystic numerology
SGAnon: Intelligence-sounding Q echoes
Derek Johnson: Legal-military “Trump-is-still-President” theories
X22 Report: Constant “the patriots are in control” reassurance

Meanwhile, Flynn started distancing himself, slowly but surely.

🧷 Signs of Discomfort:

He stopped referencing WWG1WGA
He began focusing on local action, school boards, grassroots organizing
He warned people not to wait for saviors or sealed indictments

📢 His new message:

“We need to be the plan.”

This was a big break from Q doctrine — which relies on the belief that military or Trump-led white hats are orchestrating everything behind the scenes.

🔊 3. Flynn Publicly Clashes with Q-Promoting Channels

Flynn didn't just distance himself — he began calling out the grift, including:

🔥 The “Juan O Savin” Rift:

Flynn was caught on audio calling Juan O Savin (Wayne Willott) a “clown”
He referred to his theories as "disinformation" and “nonsense”
The audio leaked and caused a huge stir in Q communities

This shattered the illusion that “all the insiders are working together.”

Flynn clearly wanted to separate real activism from LARPing.

🔥 He Berates X22:

Tells Dave that he’s selling false hope
Urges listeners to stop “just trusting the plan” and get to work

Another big shift — he essentially calls out the entire psyop-style hopium machine.

🧱 4. The Platforms Diverge

After that, Flynn’s influence pivoted hard:

🧭 Flynn’s Ecosystem Now Focuses On:

Grassroots & County-Level Action (e.g. “Precinct Strategy”)
Election integrity, faith, family, constitution
Faith-based revivalism, mixing Christian nationalism with patriot populism
ReAwaken America Tour, featuring doctors, pastors, and local activists
Real-world, offline strategies to resist globalism

Meanwhile, Q-Style Channels Pivoted Into:

“Trump-is-secretly-still-president” themes
Mystical decoding, false dates, and phantom tribunals
Crypto pitches, health supplements, and monetized hopium
And increasingly: wild, unverifiable military psyop claims

Flynn dropped the LARPing crowd and moved toward actionable influence and spiritual framing.

🧩 5. The Schism Today: Populist Realism vs Hopium Echo Chambers

We now have a clear split in the pro-Trump / anti-globalist media movement:

Flynn-Style Wing	Q-Style Channels
Grounded, strategic, real-world activism	Mystical hopium, coded drops, endless waiting
Faith + Constitution	Secret tribunals, sealed indictments
Calls out LARPs	Promotes LARP culture
Wants leaders, not messiahs	Still waits for Trump “storm”
Focus on counties, states, law	Focus on optics, rumors, decode “proofs”

Flynn is arguably leading the grown-up counter-narrative, while others are still selling fantasy timelines.

👁️ Flynn’s Break = Strategic Warning

Flynn breaking from Q-style channels was not just personal taste — it was likely:

A strategic disassociation
A warning signal to serious activists
A way to reclaim the populist movement from the edge of chaos

Because from a military intelligence perspective?

“A passive, hopium-soaked public is just as vulnerable as a demoralized one.”

Flynn clearly wants to move people from passive watchers to active agents — and that put him at odds with many of the very channels that once celebrated him.

The following has nothing to do with Flynn but this is an example of how heat can be turned up on events that happen and put some focus why something occurs which could have greater implications.

📍 Claim: The May 21 DC killings were orchestrated to rally Christian Zionist and Jewish support for military action against Iran

This theory implies:

The attack was either staged or allowed to happen.
It serves to mobilize emotional and political support among pro-Israel Christians and Jews.
It aligns with a broader strategic interest in creating conditions favorable for U.S. or Israeli action against Iran.

🔍 What Can Be Confirmed

Political Context:

Benjamin Netanyahu has long positioned Iran as Israel’s top existential threat, especially due to its nuclear program and proxy support in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza.
Donald Trump, during his presidency, pursued a "maximum pressure" campaign against Iran, including withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) in 2018.

Geopolitical Tensions:

There is historical precedent for aligning pro-Israel sentiment in the U.S. with foreign policy actions.
U.S. evangelical Christian Zionists are a powerful base of support for hardline Israeli positions.

Public Reaction:

The DC killings have been met with strong condemnation.
They are being framed by some leaders (Netanyahu included) as part of a broader wave of antisemitism and terrorism linked to pro-Palestinian extremism.

❌ What Cannot Be Confirmed

There is no direct evidence linking Netanyahu, Trump, or any intelligence agency to orchestrating this attack.
The suspect, Elias Rodriguez, has a documented history of radicalization and appears to have acted alone based on available law enforcement reports.
The narrative that the killings were intended to trigger a political or military maneuver lacks sourcing from credible intelligence or investigative reporting from the mainstream media (i.e. fake news).

🧠 Caution: Discerning Strategic Framing vs. Conspiracy

Strategic framing (e.g., using a real tragedy to build support for policy) is a common political practice.
A false flag conspiracy implies active deception and orchestration, which demands high levels of coordination, secrecy, and motive—none of which has credible backing here.
MK-Ultra victims are used as patsies to assassinate targets.
Known zealots passionate enough to be deluded into performing heinous tasks such as planting explosives, committing murder, public shootings are often cultivated.

📌 Conclusion

While it is reasonable to scrutinize whether political actors might use real events to further agendas (especially in volatile geopolitical climates), there's no substantiated evidence at this time that the May 21 killings were orchestrated or manipulated for strategic gain against Iran, but this does not necessarily mean that this isn't so. Raising the issue and bringing some heat to the event, may squash any desired effect for sympathy for Israel's genocide of Palestinians.

Caring Is Sharing

Search This Blog

THE MAIL