MAPPING GEOPOLITICS LIKE A GRANDMASTER WATCHES A CHESSBOARD. The Metaphor Holds, For Beneath The Visible Levers Of National Power Lies A Deeper Strata. This is a network of transnational influence that crosses boundaries without obstruction.

♞ Putin: The Strategic Operator

Let's look at Putin:

He's not impulsive — he's measured, historic, patient.
He reads geopolitics like a student of legacy — from Tsarist to Bolshevik to post-Soviet collapse.
His stoicism and unpredictability aren’t just cultural; they’re calculated optics.

Does he have a “soft spot for Europe”? Maybe. But more likely, it’s a respect for its civilizational contribution — even if he sees its current leadership as compromised. One thing is for sure: he’s keenly aware of where the real power lies — and it isn’t Brussels.

🌍 Europe as Designated Waste?

There’s an uncomfortable truth that is happening before our very eyes. Europe is being hollowed out:

Economically strained
Morally and spiritually fragmented
Flooded with immigration policies that erode cultural continuity
Led by bureaucrats, not visionaries

It may not be “waste” in the literal sense — but more like a depopulated buffer zone, slowly softened for future repurposing by players whose interests are not necessarily in the preservation of European sovereignty or identity.

🧠 The “Ewes” (True or False Ones) — Those Willing to Sacrifice Their Own

Let's call them “the ewes” — and we’re talking about the elite class who identify above all with their global vision — these are not simply power-seekers, but strategic engineers of influence. And yes, they will sacrifice their own (nationally, ethnically, or otherwise) for:

Long-term positioning
Cultural engineering
Consolidation of centralized global control (economic, digital, psychological)

They communicate with Putin, Trump, Xi — not always directly, but through trusted intermediaries, financial backchannels, and ideological liaisons.

These are people who play the long game and operate without borders — much like capital itself. Of whom do we speak? To some the answer is obvious. There is no debate. Others have no clue.

🕴️ Xi: Not an Independent Actor?

Many believe Xi is untouchable — the apex of the CCP machine — but there are signs that he too is entangled:

Shanghai clique, Wall Street ties, WEF entanglements
The CCP’s historic pragmatism toward Western capital suggests not total sovereignty, but mutual leverage

Whether Xi is in anyone’s “pocket” is debatable. But clearly, he understands that coexistence with the deep global money system is as crucial as any military maneuver.

🔍 Invisible Hand – The Few Who Move the Many

We come full circle: billions ruled by the invisible hand — and every move on the board:

A “war” here…
A currency collapse there…
A social movement lit up on demand…

All done so public opinion swings a certain way, markets tilt, narratives flip, and control consolidates quietly.

And when you rule perception, you don’t have to rule by force.

🧩 Strategic Vision or Conspiracy Realism?

Some will call this worldview paranoid, but to those paying attention, it’s just strategic realism. The deeper question is:

Can the pieces still check the king, or are we all just playing out a script already written?

And if we’re not kings or bishops on this board — are we watchers, scribes, or rogues moving behind the curtain?

Would love to hear your take on who — or what — you think has the best shot at challenging this invisible empire.

Caring is Sharing

Search This Blog

THE MAIL