International Observers Are Watching The USA And Noticing The Difference Between The Violent Democrats And Law-Abiding Citizens

A broader sentiment is held by many international and domestic critics of recent American political dynamics than just people organically protesting about various issues in the USA. The perceived lopsided behavior between the two dominant political blocs—Democrats and Republicans—has become a common theme in alternative media and citizen journalism. The Democrats are increasingly being tagged as the party of hate and violence. Many point out that their close ties with the KKK and finger Senator Robert Byrd as having been an "exalted cyclops" within the organization. But let's have a look at more recent activity. Here are some core points supported where possible by documented trends or patterns:

🔍 1. Incendiary Rhetoric – A Comparative View

Prominent Democratic figures have made public statements that many critics viewed as provocative or inflammatory:

• Maxine Waters (2018): Urged supporters to “create a crowd” and “push back” on Trump officials in public spaces and has particularly made her voice known concerning the Los Angeles protests, claiming Trump is trouble, don't believe what you have seen (organized terror with police vehicles set on fire and rocks thrown from bridges onto them, etc.), everything is peaceful.

• Chuck Schumer (2020): Warned Supreme Court Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh they would "pay the price" if they voted against abortion rights—comments made on the steps of the Court— is still inciting violence in interviews.

• Protesters outside Justices’ homes: In 2022, organized protests occurred outside conservative SCOTUS justices’ homes (e.g., Justice Kavanaugh), prompting criticism for violating norms and federal law (18 U.S. Code § 1507).

• Nancy Pelosi claiming that organized fire bombing of police vehicles is merely exuberance in the moment and nothing to do with the peaceful protests as she encourages people to destroy the king (a reference to the current president)

• Governor Gavin Newsom calling for rebellion against President Trump

• Others Democrats known to have been actively inciting violence are Rep. Ted Lieu, Sen. Cory Booker, Rep. Joaquin Castro, Sen. Jon Tester.

While Republican rhetoric can be fiery (e.g., Trump’s "fight like hell" speech on January 6, 2021), it's often more rhetorically combative than logistically directive (i.e., fewer calls to physically confront or surround opponents). Some argue that Republicans, by contrast, are more reactive and reserved, or even timid, especially in the face of establishment institutions or media pressure.

🧱 2. Bricks and Prepositioned Tools – Engineered Chaos?

There have been documented instances of pallets of bricks mysteriously appearing at protest sites during the 2020 BLM and Antifa-related unrest:

• Kansas City (May 2020): Police warned of “suspicious activity” involving bricks placed in downtown areas.

• Dallas, TX and New York City: Social media footage and local reports indicated bricks placed near expected protest routes, with no nearby construction.

• Los Angeles: Biological face shields and masks, and hammers for breaking concrete into rocks, were handed out by organizers.

These incidents point to premeditated violence, suggesting external orchestration rather than purely organic demonstrations. Law enforcement in some cities publicly acknowledged investigating the placements.

🕵️‍♂️ 3. Funding Chains: Soros and Protest Movements

It’s well-documented that George Soros (via his Open Society Foundations) funds a wide range of progressive organizations, including groups tied to:

• Criminal justice reform

• Bail funds (e.g., Minnesota Freedom Fund)

• Race and equity initiatives like Black Lives Matter-affiliated chapters

• ActBlue is an American Democratic Party political action committee that has been tracked funding protestor groups. 

While funding social justice isn’t inherently wrong, critics argue that some of these funds indirectly enable unrest by:

• Bailing out rioters (including those later accused of violence),

• Supporting DAs who decline to prosecute certain offenses,

• Providing operational support to organizations that encourage street-level demonstrations.

Soros himself has publicly acknowledged supporting progressive district attorney candidates to “reform the criminal justice system,” but denies directly funding riots or criminal acts.

🧥 4. Masked Agitators and Psychological Operations

The repeated presence of:

• Masked individuals leading crowd escalations,

• Untraceable organizers mobilizing through social media,

• A common aesthetic (black clothing, military-style backpacks, goggles, etc.),

...has raised concerns that certain protest elements are not just spontaneous but coordinated, possibly as part of a broader strategy to destabilize or polarize society.

Some researchers describe this as a kind of modern psychological warfare or “Fourth Generation Warfare”, where non-state actors and ideology-driven movements replace conventional warfare with social disruption.

✅ Conclusion: An Increasingly Managed Unrest

Democratic-aligned figures and organizations often appear more aggressive and organized in confrontation—whether ideologically, rhetorically, or logistically—holds water when assessed against recent patterns. Republicans may posture strongly in rhetoric or media, but appear less mobilized on the ground and more constrained by fear of backlash or reputational damage.

The sudden appearance of riot supplies, coordinated protest waves, and the selective prosecution of violence, often seem to point toward a system that tolerates or incentivizes unrest when it serves certain political ends, while quickly criminalizing those who resist or defend themselves—like Kyle Rittenhouse.

sharing is caring