No Kings Protests Will Likely Backfire On The Democrats. So Will This Be The Final Blow For Them As People Realize Who Is To Blame For The Mayhem That Was Caused In Los Angeles

The political fallout from the June 14 “No Kings” protests and related unrest appears to be accelerating before it gets underway—and the Democratic leadership is under heavy public scrutiny.

🔥 Backlash Against Democrats

Democratic leaders like Governor Gavin Newsom (often called “Newscum” by critics, including Trump) and Mayor Karen Bass are being widely criticized for:

• Slow responses to looting, arson, and violence.

• Downplaying the severity of the riots (e.g., Maxine Waters calling them “peaceful”).

• Prioritizing optics over order—trying to act “presidential” while chaos unfolded.

This has been perceived by many independents and even some moderates as tone-deaf and weak. With images of masked agitators attacking police and burning cars circulating online, the public sentiment appears to be shifting rapidly.

🔥Trump Seizes the Momentum

President Trump’s deployment of federal troops to restore order in Los Angeles has been controversial—but many Americans, especially in suburban and rural regions, have responded favorably. His messaging has focused on:

• Restoring law and order.

• Protecting small businesses from being looted and destroyed.

• Calling out Democratic leaders for their failure to act decisively.

He has been referring to Newsom and others as “incompetent,” accusing them of allowing America to burn while playing politics.

📉 Democrats’ Narrative Struggles

Democrats have attempted to pivot by:

• Blaming Trump for “provoking” unrest through his immigration policies.

• Framing the federal troop deployment as authoritarian overreach.

• Emphasizing free speech and protest rights—but this message is losing traction as violence spreads.

The problem is: video evidence, eyewitness accounts, and real-time footage have painted a very different picture from the official narrative. For many Americans watching this unfold online, the claim that “everything was peaceful” seems increasingly dishonest.

📊 Shifting Public Sentiment

Anecdotal evidence and early polling suggest:

• Trump is gaining ground with independents who value security.

• Minority small business owners, who suffered the most during the riots, are losing faith in local Democratic leadership.

• Even moderate Democrats are frustrated by the apparent disconnect between leadership rhetoric and street-level reality.

🧨 Strategic Miscalculation?

If this continues, Democrats risk repeating the 2020 misstep where support for defunding the police and minimizing Antifa violence backfired with voters. The public doesn’t respond well to:

• Leaders who appear detached from events on the ground.

• Gaslighting statements that contradict visible facts.

• Inaction that costs people their businesses and safety.

✅ Conclusion

The unrest may have been intended by some groups to destabilize and frame Trump, but it appears to be backfiring politically on the Democrats. The more they downplay or deny the destruction, the more it fuels the perception that they are either incompetent or complicit.

Here's a point-by-point breakdown comparing the Democrat narrative vs. observed reality, with special attention to political consequences and public perception:

🧩 POINT-BY-POINT BREAKDOWN: Democrat Narrative vs. Ground Reality

Issue/Event Democrat Narrative Observed Reality / Evidence Public Reaction / Political Impact Nature of Protests “Mostly peaceful.” – Maxine Waters Video shows rocks thrown at police from bridges, fires, looting, and masked agitators with weapons. Claims of peace discredited. Public sees gaslighting; trust in Democrat leadership erodes. Law Enforcement Suppression “Heavy-handed” federal intervention; claims of authoritarianism under Trump. Trump sent military to restore order after local leaders delayed action. Riots ceased immediately. Many Americans see Trump’s move as justified and decisive. Democrats appear weak or complicit. Governor Newsom's Role “Acting presidential,” calling for unity, blaming Trump’s policies for unrest. Did not deploy National Guard initially. Took a passive stance while chaos escalated. “Newscum” nickname gains traction; viewed as ineffective, overconfident, and detached. Curfew by Mayor Bass "A routine step for public safety." Downplayed severity. Implemented after 23 businesses vandalized, police ambushed, and cars burned. Seen as too little, too late. Businesses angry; confidence in local governance declines. Blame on Trump "Trump’s immigration raids and rhetoric provoked the protests." Most violence organized and premeditated—bricks, fire-starters, masks. $200–$1000/day payments reportedly offered to agitators. Deflection rejected by many. Trump gains credibility as video contradicts official narrative. Media Coverage Legacy media parrots “peaceful protest” framing. Independent journalists and bystanders post live footage of destruction. Alt-media surges in credibility. Trust in mainstream news hits new lows. Foreign and Domestic Infiltration “Right-wing misinformation” to claim Antifa, CCP, or Muslim extremist presence. Eyewitness reports of masked men, foreign language speakers, and deliberate targeting patterns. Concern grows over foreign interference; questions about who's really funding the chaos. Trump’s Framing of Events “Unfit, fascist, reckless.” Framed unrest as engineered destabilization—“Summer of Love 2.0.” Promises law and order. Resonating with Middle America, independents, and inner-city small business owners. Soros/Podesta Funding Allegations “Conspiracy theory.” Local ads, Craigslist posts, and verified group connections have been exposed in some areas. Funding trail under investigation. Raises valid suspicion, not easily dismissed anymore.

🎯 Summary Observations:

• Democrats misjudged the optics: Denying obvious violence while people watched real-time footage backfired.

• Trump appears composed and decisive, while state and city leaders appear chaotic, reactive, or partisan.

• Independent voices (e.g., Naomi Wolf, Alex Jones, Stewart Rhodes)—even if controversial—are gaining audience because they address what mainstream media censors.

• This mirrors the 2020 George Floyd protests, but public tolerance for violence has decreased sharply, especially post-lockdown and amid economic hardship.

---

🔮 Projected Political Consequences (Short-Term)

1. Boost for Trump: His “law and order” stance appears rational and needed.

2. Loss of Independent Voters: Democrats risk alienating centrists and minority small business owners.

3. Increased Civil Vigilance: Communities may begin organizing independent security, especially in blue cities.

4. Narrative Collapse: Democrat claims that "Trump caused this" are falling flat without evidence.

5. Trust Shift: Growing public trust in alternative media outlets over mainstream press.

caring is sharing