Tagging Funds And Understanding Who Controls What Is No Easy Task. Still Behind The Scenes Information Is Found Stamped: "Confidential: Not For Public Consumption"
If you don't know what it meant, we are talking about who runs what and how the public are kept in the dark like mushrooms. To give you a hint, or a call to wake up, consider the following intriguing claims that were posted on the Q board back in 2017 — and while these numbers aren’t found in any public financial reports, they're not impossible if you're looking at shadow wealth, dynastic control, and global asset influence, rather than simple Forbes-style net worth rankings for public consumption. So let's explore where the real power resides with some context and nuance.
1. George Soros – $1 Trillion?
Publicly reported net worth: ~$7–9 billion
Peak net worth (after breaking the Bank of England in 1992): ~$20–25 billion
Control/influence:
Founder of Open Society Foundations — has donated over $30+ billion
Major player in financial markets, especially during the 1980s–2000s
Heavy influence in political movements, NGOs, and international policy
Could $1 trillion be possible?
Only if you're counting leverage, undisclosed trusts, institutional control, or assets under influence rather than ownership. DOGE has not let us down in this respect. But Soros doesn't have the dynastic capital or hard infrastructure to match the Rothschilds or Sauds.
Verdict: Unlikely Soros “owns” $1 trillion, but evidence revealed by DOGE indicates he influences far more than his personal fortune suggests.
2. The Rothschilds – $2 Trillion?
Public wealth: Fragmented across many descendants and private holdings
Historical peak (19th century): Possibly $2 trillion in today’s dollars
Control/influence:
Financed wars, empires, and national banks
Still involved in banking, asset management, and real estate globally
Extremely private — wealth likely diversified into trusts, holdings, and companies under different names making it impossible to ascertain an exact amount
Do they have $2 trillion?
If you’re adding all family holdings + offshore wealth + historic assets, yes! — but it’s distributed, not in a single vault or bank account and definitely hidden.
Verdict: Most plausible when viewed as a dynasty over centuries — but the family isn’t a monolithic entity anymore, so a definitive audit is improbable.
3. House of Saud – $4 Trillion?
Public wealth (2025 est.):
Crown Prince MBS (Mohammed bin Salman): ~$1.5 trillion in PIF (Public Investment Fund)
Saudi royal family: Estimated 15,000 members, many with hundreds of millions or billions each
Control/influence:
Own the world’s largest oil reserves (Aramco’s market cap has reached $3 trillion at times)
Sovereign wealth fund is one of the largest globally
Geopolitical influence through OPEC, Islam’s holy sites, and strategic U.S. partnerships
Is $4 trillion accurate?
Yes — if you roll together:
Aramco’s value
Public Investment Fund
Royal family assets
Control over land, gold, art, and untapped resources
Verdict: Yes — definitely plausible if you measure it like Solomon’s wealth: not in just cash, but in what they control.
Key Insight: There's Public Wealth, Private Wealth, and Controlling Wealth
| Name | Public Net Worth | Controlling Wealth (Est.) | Nature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soros | ~$8B | Possibly more via financial leverage | Ideological & financial |
| Rothschilds | Varies | ~$2T across holdings | Dynastic & institutional |
| Saudi Royals | Collective billions | ~$4T+ via oil, state control | Sovereign & strategic |
Bottom Line
Q's source may very well be seeing things through the lens of state-level financial intelligence, where wealth isn’t just about bank accounts — it’s about access, influence, and control over assets that move the world.
Comments
Post a Comment