What the 2020 Election Still Teaches Us in 2025: Fraud, Suppression, and the Fight for Truth. The 2020 U.S. election raised unresolved concerns about fraud, censorship, and judicial suppression. In 2025, these issues remain central to global democracy. Here's what we’ve learned—and why it matters.
In the aftermath of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, many observers—both in America and abroad—felt something was deeply wrong. Despite receiving a record number of votes, Joe Biden’s victory triggered widespread skepticism, not merely because of the result, but because of the opacity, statistical anomalies, and media censorship that followed.
Five years on, in 2025, the full truth remains obscured. But the patterns are clearer than ever. This article revisits the most compelling facts, court cases, whistleblowers, and suppressed testimony that still matter today.
The Pennsylvania Problem
One of the most startling claims during the post-election period came from a witness at the Gettysburg hearing in November 2020. It was alleged that 1.8 million absentee ballots were sent out, yet 2.5 million were returned. This discrepancy was cited in multiple court filings and sworn affidavits, including in the case Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania .
Critics claimed the numbers were misinterpreted or outdated. Yet Republican poll watchers were denied access to properly monitor ballot counting—a serious breach of electoral transparency . If the process was clean, why hide it?
Censorship and the Algorithmic Gag Order
Following the election, major platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Google, and YouTube aggressively suppressed content questioning the vote. Thousands of posts were labeled “disinformation.” Entire accounts were banned, including that of the sitting President at the time.
Subsequent lawsuits, such as Missouri v. Biden, have uncovered evidence that Big Tech worked in tandem with government agencies to censor dissenting views . The censorship was not about facts—it was about controlling the narrative.
Why Non-Americans Should Care
Many wonder why people outside the United States—like Australians, Britons, or Europeans—care so deeply about American elections. The answer is straightforward: America’s policies ripple globally.
From trade and military alliances to pharmaceutical policy and tech censorship, the occupant of the White House influences everyone. When democracy in America falters, the world’s equilibrium tilts.
Whistleblowers Silenced
Among the many ignored voices was Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cybersecurity expert with experience in CIA, NSA, and DoD cyber operations. His sworn affidavit declared that the 2020 election was compromised by foreign and domestic actors, with vulnerabilities in voting software such as Dominion Voting Systems .
His statements supported Sidney Powell’s court filings, which were later derided without formal evidence review. Keshavarz-Nia was even referenced in a New York Times article months prior as a trusted forensic analyst.
When facts become dangerous to say out loud, we are no longer in a democracy—we are in a managed simulation of one.
Insider Testimony: George Green and the Machine
In a lesser-known but compelling claim, George Green, a former campaign fundraiser for Jimmy Carter, revealed that Carter’s win in 1976 was engineered as a placeholder to later install Rockefeller. When he refused to participate in corrupt dealings—such as alleged cocaine parties attended by senators and attempted sexual exploitation by Ted Kennedy—Green’s financial life was destroyed .
These may seem fringe at first glance, but pattern recognition is the key. Power punishes whistleblowers, rewards obedience, and suppresses memory. We must resist forgetting.
What’s Changed in 2025?
Not enough.
The 2024 election saw renewed accusations of manipulation, particularly in California, where suspicions now mirror those from the 2020 battleground states. As artificial intelligence becomes part of voting infrastructure, the risk of undetectable fraud increases exponentially.
Yet, more people than ever are alert, skeptical, and willing to ask, “Does this add up?”
The solution isn’t high-tech. It’s low-tech honesty: paper ballots, same-day voting, voter ID, and full audits. Not as political weapons—but as tools of truth.
If the establishment resists transparency, perhaps it fears what transparency would reveal.
History will not remember the complacent defenders of corrupted systems. It will remember those who stood, even when mocked, and said: “I see the fraud. I smell the suppression. And I will not be silenced.”
If democracy dies, it will not be because of one party—but because too many people stopped asking questions.
- Pilate therefore said to him, “Are you a king then?” Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king. For this reason I have been born, and for this reason I have come into the world, that I should testify to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice.” Pilate said to him, “What is truth?” (John 18:37-38 WEB)
Footnotes
Comments
Post a Comment