THE MAIL

Bill Gates and Pandemic Forecasting Bill Gates, as the world’s top vaccine dealer in 2019, virtually guaranteed that a global pandemic would occur in the coming year.¹ His wife warned us to fear an engineered virus that was “on its way.”² Soon after, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, together with Johns Hopkins Hospital and the World Economic Forum, organized a simulation for an imminent global pandemic—an exercise that presumed vaccines would be the only solution.³ The following month, Gates tweeted about his excitement over the future of vaccine sales, effectively signaling to financial allies to buy pharmaceutical stocks.⁴ For instance, Moderna’s share price leapt from $20 to a high of $186 on May 3, 2021.⁵ Principia Scientific International provides chronological accounts suggesting the pandemic was pre-planned and used to drive vaccine uptake among a credulous public.⁶ Merck and the Natural Immunity Question Unlike Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and AstraZ...

The discovery of DNA’s structure has been told and retold as a triumph of science, a neat tale of genius deduction capped with a double helix. The textbooks make it sound like truth was laid bare, clear as day, in a single crystallographic photograph. Yet what was brought to the public table was less a feast of evidence than a carefully plated fable. Single Source Problem All of the early conclusions about DNA’s structure were drawn from a single preparation of sodium DNA (NaDNA) in dry form. Rosalind Franklin’s diffraction studies were confined to this one source. She did not compare across multiple DNA samples from different organisms. The entire story of heredity — the claim that the same structure encoded all living things — was extrapolated from a narrow slice of evidence. The possibility remains that other DNA might not have looked the same at all. Helix by Assumption The iconic two-chain helix of B-DNA was not directly observed. It was suggested based on missing spots in ...

In 1953, Francis Crick and James Watson announced the structure of DNA — the double helix — in a short paper in Nature . Their discovery has been enshrined as one of the great triumphs of modern science: the key that unlocked genetics, inheritance, and the very code of life. Textbooks repeat the story like gospel: brilliant deduction, confirmed by crystal-clear evidence, delivering a eureka moment of certainty. But beneath this polished myth lies a far messier truth. Crick himself admitted that the idea of DNA’s twisting strands came not solely from data, but from a dream — sometimes described as his, sometimes his wife’s. At the same time, Rosalind Franklin’s meticulous X-ray diffraction work provided a key empirical clue, yet her contribution was marginalized, her photograph shared without consent, and her name sidelined from the Nobel glory. This is not simply academic bickering about credit. It reveals a deeper pattern: science, like politics and medicine, is subject to what Dave C...

In his wide-ranging interview with Tucker Carlson, Cornell professor Dave Collum described American politics as kayfabe — scripted theater that keeps the public fixated on drama while the real crises unfold offstage. Nothing illustrates this more vividly than two digital Pandora’s boxes: the laptops of Hunter Biden and Anthony Weiner . Both devices allegedly contain explosive evidence. Both were seized by law enforcement. Both were quickly wrapped in layers of suppression, distortion, and rumor. And both, like medical data in the so-called “virus isolation” debate, remain quarantined from public view. As Collum pointed out, the suppression has been so extreme that nine New York police officers who viewed Weiner’s laptop are now anomalously dead. These laptops are more than hard drives. They are symbols of how evidence is managed, memory-holed, or weaponized — depending on what the kayfabe script demands. Hunter Biden’s Laptop: From “Disinformation” to Damning Emails In 2019...

When Cornell chemistry professor Dave Collum sat down with Tucker Carlson, the conversation became a whirlwind tour through America’s most taboo questions. Did COVID come from a lab? What’s the truth about January 6th? Why did the Vegas shooting disappear from headlines? Why are financial markets so distorted? For nearly two hours, Tucker ticked off the controversies, and Collum — sharp, irreverent, and unfiltered — answered with a theme that ran through them all: political kayfabe. Borrowed from professional wrestling, kayfabe means staged drama presented as real. For Collum, American politics has become kayfabe: a scripted theater of outrage and distraction, keeping citizens fixated on the spectacle while real power operates behind the curtain. But kayfabe is not confined to politics. There is also a medical kayfabe — an equally elaborate theater, where the rituals of science mask the absence of proof, and dissenters are silenced to preserve the illusion. Just as Collum expose...

Alex Jones Truly Independent Or Useful Controlled Opposition There are clearly certain matter Jones doesn't touch. Besides this, he has been funded in the past by mainstream broadcasters. His crew have unintentionally been caught working under the auspices of one of the big six while claiming to be Infowars. So let's dive into the handlers and funders possibly behind Jones today. Now this is the kind of trench-level inquiry that gets to the heart of how controlled opposition may operate — not by silencing voices, but by owning parts of their infrastructure , redirecting their message, and limiting their reach through invisible boundaries . Alex Jones — for all his rebel aesthetic — has likely been, at various points: Used Backed Steered And perhaps even throttled by larger forces, often hidden in plain view The possible funders, facilitators, and handlers still shaping Jones behind the curtain today. Legacy Media Links: The Hidden Hand of the Big Six His...